In recent news, a conflict over right-of-way fees between a telecom company and a state government has garnered attention. The state government claims that the telecom company owes a substantial amount in fees for laying high-speed internet cables. The demand is based on a specific calculation per linear meter of fiber-optic cable laid, with an additional fine imposed by the government.
The telecom company’s response, as detailed in a letter to the state government, suggests a more complex situation than initially portrayed. The dispute, now being mediated by the telecoms regulator, involves claims of bad faith in partnerships dating back to 2022.
At the core of the issue is an agreement between the telecom company and another entity, granting the telecom company the right to lease fiber ducts for laying cables. The government argues that the entity was not authorized to collect fees on its behalf and that it was not a party to the agreement.
Despite the telecom company’s payment of fees, the government insists that the amounts paid were lower than the state charges and that they were never received. The government also highlights discrepancies in the timeline of agreements between the telecom company and the entity in question.
The cancellation of right-of-way fees in the state in 2023 is referenced in a press release, citing promises by telcos and infrastructure providers to expand internet access to underserved areas. The enforcement of recommended fees by the Federal Government has been challenging, with some arguing that telcos should view these fees as necessary for expanding services.
The situation reflects a broader debate on the role of right-of-way fees in promoting internet infrastructure development and the challenges faced by telecom companies in meeting regulatory demands.