Reports suggest that there have been discussions between two Italian football clubs, Juventus and Napoli, regarding the potential transfer of Nigerian striker Victor Osimhen. Juventus is reportedly considering Osimhen as a candidate for their striking position, especially with uncertainties surrounding the future of their current forward, Dusan Vlahovic.
Vlahovic’s contract situation has put Juventus in a position where they might need to consider selling him if contract negotiations do not progress as desired. Meanwhile, Osimhen, who is currently on loan at Galatasaray, has been in excellent form, scoring eight goals and providing four assists in 10 games this season.
The potential transfer of Osimhen to Juventus faces obstacles due to his high market value and the historical rivalry between Napoli and Juventus. Napoli has set a price tag of €60–70 million for the striker and prefers a straightforward sale over player exchanges.
Osimhen’s loan move to Galatasaray came after a failed transfer attempt to Chelsea and Saudi Arabia. A clause in his loan deal allows Napoli to negotiate his sale in January. Despite interest from Galatasaray in a permanent deal, meeting Napoli’s valuation may prove challenging for the Turkish club.
Juventus’ interest in Osimhen could complicate matters for Chelsea, who had previously shown interest in the player. Chelsea is said to be considering reigniting their pursuit of Osimhen in the future, as they have the financial capacity to meet Napoli’s demands and see him as a valuable addition to their squad.
Osimhen had a turbulent time at Napoli last season, which included a controversial TikTok incident and a challenging season on the field. These factors led to his loan move to Galatasaray, where he has managed to rejuvenate his career.
Despite his previous success at Napoli, the relationship between Osimhen and the club has soured, paving the way for a potential transfer. Juventus’ interest in Osimhen highlights the growing demand for the talented forward, although Napoli’s preference for a cash-only deal remains steadfast.













Leave a Reply